What the Raspberry Pi time-server guides get wrong on a Pi 4, with the measurements. The headline artifact is a four-line pps-gpio patch: PREEMPT_RT force-threads IRQ handlers, and pps-gpio takes its timestamp inside its handler, so the realtime kernel puts a scheduler between the electrical edge and the clock. IRQF_NO_THREAD takes RMS offset from 2468 ns to 199 ns. - kernel/ the patch - dashboard/ live status page (position hidden by default) - docs-site/ the write-up (Astro/Starlight, brass, no tutorial section)
2.4 KiB
2.4 KiB
| title | description | sidebar | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The measurements | Every number on this site, with the methodology that produced it. Check our work. |
|
All numbers from one Raspberry Pi 4 + BerryGPS-IMU v4 (u-blox CAM-M8C), PPS on GPIO18. n = 1. Check them against your own board.
Headline progression
| Change | RMS offset | Root dispersion |
|---|---|---|
| Baseline (stock kernel, stock chrony) | 823 ns | 16.8 µs |
chrony filter 10 + prefer on PPS refclock |
440 ns | 5 µs |
| PREEMPT_RT, unpatched | 2468 ns ← worse | 11.6 µs |
PREEMPT_RT + IRQF_NO_THREAD |
199 ns | 6.3 µs |
Raw PPS jitter (kernel-timestamped)
| Kernel | jitter (σ) | peak-to-peak |
|---|---|---|
| Stock | 2134 ns | 11 µs |
| PREEMPT_RT (threaded handler) | 6947 ns | 38 µs |
| PREEMPT_RT + patch (hard-irq handler) | 2568 ns | 18 µs |
The dashboard's tax
A/B/A, 62 s per round. Why this matters.
| Dashboard off | Dashboard on | |
|---|---|---|
| Before fix | 1304 ns | 1912 / 2179 ns (+36%) |
| After fix | 1437 ns | 1169 / 1450 ns (no penalty) |
Things that did nothing
| Change | Result |
|---|---|
| Baud 9600 → 115200 | PPS offset −1 ns either way. Identical. |
| SBAS disabled | No measurable change to PPS. |
isolcpus alone |
Inconclusive-to-harmful (concentrates load onto the PPS core). |
Methodology
Don't trust chrony's own stats for this. chronyc sourcestats reports a
windowed, median-filtered figure that lags reality and hides what you're trying to
see. Measure the kernel's PPS timestamps directly:
sudo timeout 62 ppstest /dev/pps0 | awk '
/assert/ {
split($0, a, "assert "); split(a[2], b, ","); t = b[1] + 0;
if (prev > 0) {
d = (t - prev - 1.0) * 1e9; # deviation from exactly 1.000000000 s, in ns
n++; sum += d; sumsq += d*d;
if (d > max || n == 1) max = d;
if (d < min || n == 1) min = d;
}
prev = t
}
END {
mean = sum/n; sd = sqrt(sumsq/n - mean*mean);
printf "n=%d jitter_sd=%.0f ns p2p=%.0f ns\n", n, sd, max-min
}'
Each pulse should be exactly 1.000000000 s after the last. The deviation is the jitter.
Always run A/B/A, never A/B. Clock behaviour drifts on the scale of minutes; if you measure on-then-off you cannot tell a real effect from thermal drift or a satellite geometry change. Go on → off → on, and require the two "on" rounds to agree before you believe the middle one.