IfxSocket owns a read-ahead buffer that BufferedSocketReader fills and
drains. Connection._drain_to_eot, _raise_sq_err and the login path
bypass that reader and call IfxSocket.read_exact directly, which recv'd
from the socket without looking at the buffer. Bytes sitting in the
buffer were skipped, and skipped bytes in a length-framed protocol do
not announce themselves -- the next read lands mid-field and every read
after it is wrong.
Nothing triggers it today. The server sends one response per request, so
recv returns exactly that response and the buffered reader consumes all
of it before control returns to a direct read. That is a property of the
traffic, not of the code, and the buffer is connection-scoped precisely
so read-ahead can cross response boundaries -- pipelined executemany
already puts several responses in flight. read_exact now drains the
buffer first, which costs one branch on a cold path and makes the two
paths agree by construction rather than by luck.
fill_recv_buf believed whatever byte count it was handed, and that count
is almost always a length field straight off the wire. A garbage
0x7FFFFFFF reads as a 2 GB request and the fill loop sits in recv until
the read timeout while the buffer grows. It now refuses above
IFX_MAX_READ_BYTES (256 MiB default) with an error naming the number,
which is the actual diagnostic: a length that absurd means framing was
already lost upstream.
BufferedSocketReader.skip advanced the cursor arithmetically with no
guard, so a negative count rewound it and re-decoded consumed bytes as
the next field. The base reader's skip delegates to read_exact and does
guard; this one diverged.
Transaction control run as SQL desynced Connection._in_transaction,
which is what commit() and rollback() are guarded by and what the pool
reads to decide whether a returned connection needs cleaning up. With
autocommit on, cursor.execute("BEGIN WORK") opened a real transaction
while the flag stayed False, so rollback() returned successfully having
sent nothing and the rows it was asked to discard survived. The
connection then went back to the pool holding an open transaction and
its locks. With autocommit off it failed instead: the driver's implicit
SQ_BEGIN fired first and the caller's BEGIN WORK got -535.
The server labels these -- 34 BEGIN, 35 COMMIT, 36 ROLLBACK, with and
without the WORK keyword, measured on all three versions. JDBC reads the
same values off the describe and calls setTxBeginState/setTxEndState.
_ensure_transaction moves to after the describe, matching JDBC's
initiateTransaction placement, which is what makes it possible to skip
for transaction control at all -- until the describe lands you cannot
know that is what the statement is.
