Kristoffer Dalby bceac495f9 policy: add NodeNeedsPeerRecompute predicate
Reports whether a node's online/offline transition forces peers to recompute their netmap. True for subnet routers, relay targets (tailscale.com/cap/relay), and via targets; false otherwise.

The relay-target IP set and via-target tag set are precompiled from the grants in updateLocked, alongside the existing filter, so the per-node check is a cheap set lookup. Keyed on the node itself, so an ordinary node in a tailnet that uses relay or via for other nodes is still classified as not needing a recompute.

Updates #3293
2026-06-03 14:51:57 +02:00

121 lines
4.9 KiB
Go

package policy
import (
"net/netip"
"time"
"github.com/juanfont/headscale/hscontrol/policy/matcher"
policyv2 "github.com/juanfont/headscale/hscontrol/policy/v2"
"github.com/juanfont/headscale/hscontrol/types"
"tailscale.com/tailcfg"
"tailscale.com/types/views"
)
type PolicyManager interface {
// Filter returns the current filter rules for the entire tailnet and the associated matchers.
Filter() ([]tailcfg.FilterRule, []matcher.Match)
// FilterForNode returns filter rules for a specific node, handling autogroup:self
FilterForNode(node types.NodeView) ([]tailcfg.FilterRule, error)
// MatchersForNode returns matchers for peer relationship determination (unreduced)
MatchersForNode(node types.NodeView) ([]matcher.Match, error)
// BuildPeerMap constructs peer relationship maps for the given nodes
BuildPeerMap(nodes views.Slice[types.NodeView]) map[types.NodeID][]types.NodeView
SSHPolicy(baseURL string, node types.NodeView) (*tailcfg.SSHPolicy, error)
// SSHCheckParams resolves the SSH check period for a (src, dst) pair
// from the current policy, avoiding trust of client-provided URL params.
SSHCheckParams(srcNodeID, dstNodeID types.NodeID) (time.Duration, bool)
SetPolicy(pol []byte) (bool, error)
SetUsers(users []types.User) (bool, error)
SetNodes(nodes views.Slice[types.NodeView]) (bool, error)
// NodeCanHaveTag reports whether the given node can have the given tag.
NodeCanHaveTag(node types.NodeView, tag string) bool
// TagExists reports whether the given tag is defined in the policy.
TagExists(tag string) bool
// NodeCanApproveRoute reports whether the given node can approve the given route.
NodeCanApproveRoute(node types.NodeView, route netip.Prefix) bool
// NodeNeedsPeerRecompute reports whether peers must recompute their
// netmap when the node's online state changes. True for subnet
// routers, relay targets (tailscale.com/cap/relay), and via targets;
// false for ordinary nodes, which only need a lightweight online or
// offline peer patch. [State.Connect] and [State.Disconnect] use it to
// avoid a tailnet-wide recompute on every ordinary reconnect.
NodeNeedsPeerRecompute(node types.NodeView) bool
// ViaRoutesForPeer computes via grant effects for a viewer-peer pair.
// It returns which routes should be included (peer is via-designated for viewer)
// and excluded (steered to a different peer). When no via grants apply,
// both fields are empty and the caller falls back to existing behavior.
ViaRoutesForPeer(viewer, peer types.NodeView) types.ViaRouteResult
// NodeCapMap returns the policy-derived CapMap for the given node,
// or nil when no nodeAttrs entry targets it. The returned map is
// owned by the manager; treat it as read-only and copy before
// merging into a [tailcfg.Node]. It describes the node's own
// capabilities, not a per-viewer view.
NodeCapMap(id types.NodeID) tailcfg.NodeCapMap
// NodeCapMaps returns a snapshot of the per-node policy CapMap so
// callers can amortise lock acquisitions over a peer loop. The
// outer map is a fresh container; the inner [tailcfg.NodeCapMap]
// values are shared with the manager and read-only.
NodeCapMaps() map[types.NodeID]tailcfg.NodeCapMap
// NodesWithChangedCapMap returns the IDs of nodes whose nodeAttrs
// CapMap shifted during recent updateLocked calls. The buffer
// drains on read; callers consume it once per update cycle to
// decide which nodes need a self-targeted MapResponse.
// refreshNodeAttrsLocked appends to the buffer rather than
// overwriting, so a SetUsers/SetNodes between SetPolicy and the
// drain cannot lose the policy-reload diff.
NodesWithChangedCapMap() []types.NodeID
Version() int
DebugString() string
}
// NewPolicyManager returns a new [PolicyManager].
func NewPolicyManager(pol []byte, users []types.User, nodes views.Slice[types.NodeView]) (PolicyManager, error) {
var (
polMan PolicyManager
err error
)
polMan, err = policyv2.NewPolicyManager(pol, users, nodes)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
return polMan, err
}
// PolicyManagersForTest returns all available [PolicyManager] implementations to
// be used in tests to validate them in tests that try to determine that they
// behave the same.
func PolicyManagersForTest(pol []byte, users []types.User, nodes views.Slice[types.NodeView]) ([]PolicyManager, error) {
var polMans []PolicyManager
for _, pmf := range PolicyManagerFuncsForTest(pol) {
pm, err := pmf(users, nodes)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
polMans = append(polMans, pm)
}
return polMans, nil
}
func PolicyManagerFuncsForTest(pol []byte) []func([]types.User, views.Slice[types.NodeView]) (PolicyManager, error) {
polmanFuncs := make([]func([]types.User, views.Slice[types.NodeView]) (PolicyManager, error), 0, 1)
polmanFuncs = append(polmanFuncs, func(u []types.User, n views.Slice[types.NodeView]) (PolicyManager, error) {
return policyv2.NewPolicyManager(pol, u, n)
})
return polmanFuncs
}